October 30th, 2006

Closing Acts


Arnold Schwarzenegger’s closing TV spot of the 2003 recall campaign.

With tracking polls holding steady, talk is turning to Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s prospective victory margin and to down ballot races and propositions, where several remain tight. Schwarzenegger is closing out his 2006 campaign with a TV ad launched last Friday. Like his closer in the 2003 recall campaign, it is positive and uplifting. But the two ads, shown above and below, reflect very different circumstances.


Arnold Schwarzenegger’s closing TV spot of the 2006 re-election campaign.

Before comparing Schwarzenegger’s re-election closer with his first election closer, there have been down ballot developments, in the closely fought races for lieutenant governor and state insurance commissioner.

Democratic sources acknowledge that John Garamendi, after taking a 10-point lead in public polling over Republican Tom McClintock in their race for lieutenant governor, had fallen a little behind in private polling. But now they say that, although the race is still a statistical dead heat, Garamendi is slowly moving up.

If there were more resources behind Garamendi, both in his official campaign and in party and labor independent expenditures on his behalf, it might be happening more quickly. But Insurance Commissioner Garamendi has not been a big fundraiser, and party and labor efforts until recently have focused on trying to jump start the campaign of trailing Democratic gubernatorial candidate Phil Angelides.

Democrats had entertained hopes that an earlier ad depicting McClintock, the state’s most prominent conservative politician, as being outside California’s mainstream with his positions on social and environmental issues might put him away. It did not. Nevertheless, they are feeling a bit better with the overall effort kicking into gear. Republicans say McClintock has a slight lead, within the margin of polling error.

In more unalloyed news for Republicans, moderate Silicon Valley entrepreneur Steve Poizner, running what has been a close race for state insurance commissioner against Lieutenant Governor Cruz Bustamante, yesterday picked up the endorsement of California’s leading Spanish language newspaper, La Opinion.

Since Bustamante is one of America’s highest ranking Latino elected officials, that’s striking. However, he has been damaged goods since the recall, when as the replacement Democratic nominee he was crushed by Schwarzenegger after improperly moving millions in Indian casino tribe donations into his campaign. In this race, he has compounded matters by at first raising money from the insurance companies he would regulate, then saying he would give it back (after it turned out not to be a lot), and running TV ads emphasizing his dramatic weight loss.

Speaking of drama, Schwarzenegger’s closing TV ad for the re-election campaign is less dramatic than his closing TV ad for the recall campaign.

It’s called “33.” That’s the current number of newspapers that have endorsed him over trailing Democratic candidate Phil Angelides. As the names of endorsing newspapers crawl across the bottom of the screen and the announcer reads some of the laudatory things written about the former action superstar as governor, pull quotes from the endorsements are superimposed on the screen over a spectacular montage of California scenes. With appropriate music, of course, which you’ve heard throughout the fine ad campaign produced for Schwarzenegger. The announcer manages to work in the word “bipartisan” twice in only 30 seconds.

It’s a very effective ad, which seeks to soothe and reassure as it inspires. Media consultant Fred Davis put it together with campaign manager Steve Schmidt, chief strategist Matthew Dowd, and senior strategist Sarah Simmons.

The former Mr. Universe has pulled off the biggest sweep of newspaper endorsements for California governor in my lifetime. Among well-known newspapers, Angelides has only two endorsements. La Opinion, the Spanish language newspaper in Los Angeles, which could hardly endorse Schwarzenegger given his continued opposition to drivers licenses for illegal immigrants, and the San Francisco Bay Guardian, the most left-wing weekly newspaper in the state. Angelides had also been blitzed in the battle for newspaper endorsements by his narrowly defeated primary rival, ex-eBay honcho-turned state Controller Steve Westly, winning only the latter mentioned paper and two dailies, his hometown Sacramento Bee and the Los Angeles Times, which went at Schwarzenegger hammer and tong in the recall campaign. Schwarzenegger, of course, won the endorsements of those two dailies for the general election.

The ad style was very different in the recall campaign. The biggest media outlet in the state, the Los Angeles Times, was thoroughly opposed to the action movie superstar’s candidacy. And so was most of the California political establishment. Schwarzenegger was viewed as an interloper (Times headlines referred to him as “Actor”), the recall a “threat to democracy” (many more people participated in it than in the regular election).

The campaign itself was quite tumultuous. Schwarzenegger, aided by a message advisory memo from media consultant Don Sipple sent over the night before, had shocked most of the world with his candidacy, announced at a taping of the Tonight Show.

Originally intending to run in 2006, Schwarzenegger parachuted into the race just two months before the recall election, fresh, if you will, from the global intricacies of launching the third installment of his Terminator movie franchise. His fortunes waxed, waned, and waxed again as he hurriedly brought himself up to speed on state issues, acted as ringmaster with an international media circus, fought complex political crosscurrents, and dealt with sensational personal attacks.

His closing TV ad, devised by Sipple and narrated by action movie figure and distinguished character actor Clancy Brown (Starship Troopers and Highlander, as well as Carnivale and Shawshank Redemption, and a congressman’s son and St. Alban’s grad, to boot), reflected this tumult.

Where the current Team Arnold presents Schwarzenegger as a steady, somewhat visionary figure, reassuring by virtue of all those newspaper endorsements (amidst the beautiful montage of California scenes, Schwarzenegger himself appears only briefly at the end), the recall spot, entitled “Momentum,” focuses almost entirely on Schwarzenegger.

In contrast to this election’s closer, the 2003 closer presents Schwarzenegger as a dynamic rather than reassuring figure, almost as a movement leader. Indeed, Schwarzenegger had become the face of the recall, which would ultimately succeed or fail on his appeal.

Where this year, Schwarzenegger has had a big lead for months (having seized it with a decisive series of moves after the June primary), and is running to hold onto that lead, in 2003, Schwarzenegger, who had been locked in a close race prior to the only debate he participated in, was still driving for a big win.

Which he got, in landslide fashion. The recall of Governor Gray Davis passed with an 11-point margin of victory and on the multi-candidate replacement ballot, Schwarzenegger walloped replacement Democratic nominee Cruz Bustamante, the lieutenant governor, by a 17-point margin.

This year, although Schwarzenegger has been carrying a lead roughly the same as his 2003 margin of victory, most observers expect Angelides to at last pick up some of the Democratic vote which has eluded him for months, reducing the size of a Schwarzenegger landslide.

0 Responses to “Closing Acts”

  1. Ann says:

    Are these the 2 closers?

  2. Bill says:

    Yep, they were out over the weekend as a test to see how they looked and played in the NWN environment, on various platforms.

  3. Kandy Kid says:

    In today’s Sacramento Bee, Dan Walters suggests the Democrats would be better positioned to win the Governor’s Office in 2010 if Strickland or McClintock wins their second-tier slots. Clearly beating cash poor right wing nuts is easier than beating solid, well-funded moderates.

    If there were a unified, strategic Democrat campaign, they would let Garamendi lose the meaningless LG office to hobble Republicans four years from now in the pre-redistricting battle that really matters.

  4. jillian says:

    Very class closer ad….the scenic montage is just awesome

  5. AthlonGuy says:

    The 2nd one gives me the youtube error:
    This is a private video. If you have been sent this video, please make sure you accept the sender’s friend request.

  6. Jonas Blane says:

    These two ads are head and shoulders above the Democratic ads I’ve seen from California this year.

  7. Sacramento Solon says:

    Kandy,

    Just read Orca’s article. Interesting spin he puts on things.

    While I think it would be interesting to see McClintock, I do believe that TS would be a disaster as Controller.

    By the way, have you noticed the mention to closing the boarders in McClintock’s television ad? Wonder if folks truly believe his “vision” is the same on the issue as GAS?

    Final note on something you commented on last week. No, I’m not a current or former legislative staffer. Just someone who has been around the process for a long, long, time.

  8. Jonathan Hemlock says:

    It has come to this for Mr. Angelides.

    We are comparing the final TV ads from Gov. Schwarzenegger’s two campaigns for governor and wondering how big his landslide will be.

    I vote for the 2003 ad. It’s more inspirational and reminds me of the excitement and fun of the recall.

  9. Bill Bradley says:

    Athlon, I think that’s just a YouTube glitch with the second ad, the 2006 closer ad. In any event, though, try it again.

  10. AthlonGuy says:

    Ok its fixed now. There’s no telling what’s going on in the youtube servers. That beach scene in the 2nd ad is Long Beach. I asked about that a couple days ago.

  11. Ann says:

    I like both the Schwarzeneger ads but I like the 2003 one better. It’s more interesting and the new one makes me feel like I’ve had a sedative.

  12. Sacramento Solon says:

    I had no problem viewing either ad.

    Would cast my vote for 2006 as I think it speaks more to someone who’s looking to resolve problems not pick a fight.

  13. Ann says:

    If Westly were the Democratic candidate instead of Angelides we wouldn’t be wondering which Schwarzeneger landslide will be bigger. We wouldn’t be worrying about the entire down ballot besides Jerry Brown and Lockyer.

    The party and labor leaders respnsible for the Angerlides disaster have much to answer for.

  14. Bill Bradley says:

    I think both Arnold closer ads, 2003 and 2006, are very good.

    While both elections center on the same man, they reflect very different circumstances. Clearly, 2003 was much more exciting, and the 2003 ad reflects that.

  15. Lucas says:

    I wonder if Team Angelides will send out another press release touting the virtues of the Rasmussen Poll now that Arnold is leading in their latest poll 53 to 40.

  16. Bill Bradley says:

    Strangely, no. Nor do I see the Rasmussen poll touted on either the Alliance for a Better California site nor the California Majority Report site.

    It won’t be on the front page of NWN, either, but that is because I don’t credit the poll, no matter what the numbers are.

  17. Jonathan Hemlock says:

    The behind scenes story of Mr. Sipple and Mr. Schwarzenegger’s campaign announcement and the closing TV commercial in the recall campaign is very interesting. When there is more time, there should be more.

  18. Bill Bradley says:

    NWN will be focusing even more on Arnold Schwarzenegger now that even Angelides partisans are tacitly conceding the contest is over.

    Where he is now, where he is going, what themes are emerging about both him and our politics, how he got here.

  19. Ralph says:

    STEVE POIZNER FOR INSURANCE COMMISSIONER

    A candidate to rid the state of Uninsured Drivers who are taking advantage of normal Californians who have been paying their Auto Insurance faithfully for years.
    This is Cruz Bustamante’s last Jab at Californians and should retire as a Loser.

  20. Vicky C says:

    You did not mention Anglides until the 9th paragraph!

  21. wilbur says:

    Ralph, exactly how can an Insurance Commissioner rid the state of uninsured drivers? I was unaware that the Commissioner has any enforcement powers over drivers, any patrol units to enforce the financial responsibility law on the street, or any control over the DMV licensing division’s financial responsibility enforcement powers. The IC regulates not the drivers but the insurance companies.

    I agree Bustamante should be put out to pasture, but of all the possible reasons this seems a b.s. argument for doing so. What am I missing?

  22. jillian says:

    Bill finally you get some peace:) I’m looking forward to your comments about the next term for the Gov

  23. jillian says:

    Bill finally you get some peace:) I’m looking forward to your comments about the next term for the Gov

  24. Bill Bradley says:

    Oh, I would n’t go nearly that far. :)

    >Bill finally you get some peace:)

Leave a Reply